Skip to content
Explore the latest in Dutch technology, startups, and digit…

The Venezuelan Crisis May Now Define Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the Global Order

Following executing a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a group comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" actually means is unclear, but the commitment marks an dramatic change of course for the president, full of contradictions and daunting obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He pledged to recruit American energy companies to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, providing capital for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is ready to use armed force internationally.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be hard for some of Trump's supporters to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of abandoning his political base, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "firm and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, territory and assets that are core to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise larger concerns in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible attack on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"The United States should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders prior to launching the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a triumph – with zero American casualties and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is betting his legacy on that success continuing, as the US says it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

Written by

David Larson

A tech journalist and startup advisor based in Amsterdam, passionate about covering emerging technologies and entrepreneurial stories.

LunaHub

Type to search articles.